Ethics

ETHICS TO BE FOLLOWED DURING PUBLICATION

IRAETC Journals follows highest practices defined by the COPE (Committee of Publication Ethics) for editors. The publication of IRAETC involves conscientious, systematic and comprehensive processes by publishers and editors which require to be dealt with efficiently and competently. To maintain high ethical standards of publication of quality science the publisher strives to work closely at all times with journal editors, authors and peer-reviewers.

The essentials of IRAETC publishing ethics for all groups involved in the publishing process are as follows:

IRAETC Editors’ Responsibilities
  • The editor of a journal holds a vital position taking important editorial decisions on all peer-reviewed submitted for publication.
  • The editor should maintain the transparency of the academic research & record, preclude professional needs from cooperating ethical standards, and always be willing to publish retractions, rectifications, and erratum when required.
  • The editor should assess manuscripts for their scientific quality and intellectual content, free from any sort of biased decisions based on discrimination of race, gender, geographical origin, or religion of the author(s). The editor should evaluate manuscripts objectively based on their academic merit free of any commercial or self-interests.
  • The editor should not disclose any information on submitted manuscripts before publication of the manuscript.
  • Promoting research rectitude must be preserved. If at any stage the publisher suspects any kind of misconduct in research, it should be investigated promptly in detail with suitable authority; and if any suspicious act of misconduct is observed in the peer review, it should be resolved with diligence.
IRAETC Reviewers’ Responsibilities
  • Providing a detailed, constructive, and unbiased evaluation in a timely manner on the scientific content of the work.
  • Indicating whether the writing is relevant, concise & clear and evaluating the originality and scientific accuracy.
  • Maintaining the confidentiality of the complete review process.
  • Notifying the journal editor about any financial or personal conflict of interest and declining to review the manuscript when a possibility of such a conflict exists.
  • Notifying the journal editor of any ethical concerns in their evaluation of submitted manuscripts; such as any violation of ethical treatment of animal or human subjects or any considerable similarity between the previously published article and any reviewed manuscript.
Authorship

The following policies apply to all IRAETC journals, unless otherwise noted. Everyone listed as an author should meet our criteria for authorship. Everyone who meets our criteria for authorship must be listed as an author.

We expect that all authors will take public responsibility for the content of the manuscript submitted to IRAETC. The contributions of all authors must be described.

All authors will be contacted by email at submission to ensure that they are aware of and approve the submission of the manuscript, its content, and its authorship. Some IRAETC journals require that all co-authors confirm their assent to publication by email.

Authors’ Responsibilities
  • All the work reported in the manuscript must be original and free from any kind of plagiarism.
  • The work should not have been published elsewhere or submitted to any other journal(s) at the same time.
  • Any potential conflict of interest must be clearly acknowledged.
  • Proper acknowledgements to other work reported (individual/company/institution) must be given. Permission must be obtained from any content used from other sources.
  • Only those who have made any substantial contribution to the interpretation or composition of the submitted work, should be listed as ‘Authors’. While other contributors should be mentioned as ‘co-authors’.
Publishers’ Responsibilities
  • IRAETC is committed to work with journal editors, defining clearly their relevant roles, in order to ensure appropriate decisions regarding publication procedures and maintaining the transparency of editorial decisions.
  • IRAETC ensures the integrity autonomy and originality of each published article with respect to:
    • publication and research fundings
    • publication ethics and rectitude
    • conflicts of interest
    • confidentiality
    • authorship
    • article modifications
    • timely publication of content

Ethics topics to consider:

Authorship of the paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study.

Originality and plagiarism: The author(s) should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the author(s) have used the words of others that this has been appropriately quoted.

Data access and retention: Author(s) may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: An author should not in publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. IRAETC Journals does not view the following uses of a work as prior publication: publication in the form of an abstract; publication as an academic thesis; or publication as an electronic preprint. Information on prior publications is included within each IRAETC Journals journal's Guide for Authors. Acknowledgment of sources: Appropriate acknowledgment.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: All submissions must include disclosure of all relationships that could be viewed as presenting a potential conflict of interest.

Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance.

Hazards and human or animal subjects: Statements of compliance are required if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that has any unusual hazards inherent in their use, or if it involves the use of animal or human subjects.

Use of patient images or case details: Studies on patients or volunteers require ethics committee approval and informed consent, which should be documented in the paper.

Authorship Changes: The authorship changes are concerned in the following conditions:-

  1. To add a corresponding author before publication of the manuscript.
  2. To remove a corresponding author before publication of the manuscript.
  3. To add a corresponding author after the publication of the manuscript.
  4. To remove a corresponding author after the publication of the manuscript.

 To change the authorship of a manuscript our process are as follows:-

  • Need to provide a valid reason(s) for changing in the authorship of the article.
  • All authors should agree on the change of authorship details. If all agree the authorship will be changed.
    If not agree, the article will be in the same position until all authors are agree to change in authorship.